KLOW... anyone tried it?

TrimKing

TrimKing

Active member
Hey everyone, I'm new here. I've messed around with a few peps before, but I'm having trouble finding any good info on KLOW. I just heard about it. I've searched around, but I only see info on GLOW, not KLOW specifically. Anyone have links to articles or personal experiences? I'm curious about dosage with an 80mg vial. Any tips are greatly appreciated!
 
Look into "KPV". KLOW is just GLOW plus KPV. I'm taking KPV with GHK-Cu, but not TB-500 or BPC. I think the biggest change I've seen is that my arm freckles are fading. I'm also taking glutathione, so maybe that's it? Also, I have a couple of age spots that seem to be disappearing, and my pores look smaller. My skin seems fuller, and my hands look less dry. I'm guessing that's collagen doing its thing.
 
Me too! I just need to do some more research, but it sounds like a really good pep. It's hard finding reliable info on protocols. At least, I'm having a hard time.
 
I've got some on the way. My supplier didn't have the premixed Klow, so I ordered Glow and I'm going to add the KPV myself. I'm thinking of reconstituting the KPV with 1ml of bac water and the Glow with 2ml, then mixing them together. From what I've seen, you just follow the glow protocol. But, everyone seems to do something different. Some people do 5 days on, 2 days off.
 
That's helpful! The math always confuses me! If I get an 80MG vial of KLOW or GLOW that's already mixed and I add, say, 3ml of BAC, I'm not sure how to figure the right dose. I'm still trying to figure it all out. Like I said... numbers are not my friend! 😂
 
Just a heads up that the BPC-157 and TB-500 found in both GLOW and KLOW could increase the risk of cancer. Maybe not cause it directly, but they can really accelerate the growth of cancer through angiogenesis and VEGF. TB-500 also seems like it may raise the chance of existing cancers spreading, based on the TB4 research.

The same mechanisms that make them potentially dangerous for cancer – angiogenesis and VEGF increase – is what makes them so effective for repairing injuries. That's why I use them myself, but only when I really need them. I wouldn't use them all the time just for skin benefits.
 
Source for that claim? My understanding is that any cancer worries with BPC-157 and TB-500 are only theoretical, based on their biological effects and some limited animal studies. We need more research to really know how they affect cancer development in people over the long term.
 
Angiogenesis and VEGF are known factors in increasing tumor growth rates. This is well-established science, to the point that anti-VEGF/angiogenesis treatments are a major area of cancer research right now.

BPC-157 and TB-500 boost angiogenesis and VEGF levels - that's how they work and why they're helpful.

Either they do what we're taking them for, and we know that can almost certainly increase tumor growth rates, or they don't and there's less reason to take them.

For TB4/TB500 specifically:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27322297/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1078143910000505

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.4161/cbt.13.4.18691

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22281683/

General VEGF and cancer risks:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009286742200181X

https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/understanding/what-is-cancer

BPC-157 and angiogenesis:

https://www.eurekaselect.com/article/45147

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00109-020-01924-x

Angiogenesis and cancer growth:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-023-01460-1

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/tumor-angiogenesis

https://jeccr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13046-023-02826-5

https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/types/immunotherapy/angiogenesis-inhibitors

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1252428/full

We're not likely to see large-scale studies on these anytime soon. Using the data we have is the best way to make informed decisions about their safety. We know how they work, and we know that these mechanisms are risk factors for faster tumor growth and spread.

Could they somehow reduce these risks? Maybe. But ignoring the evidence that these mechanisms can boost cancer growth and just hoping they don't apply feels like wishful thinking.

I'm not saying don't use them. I use them. But I know the risks, so I'm careful about when and how long I use them. Especially with other risk factors like increased IGF-1 from HGH, which can also speed up tumor growth if cancer is present.

Again, it's not that they cause cancer, but that if you have a cancerous growth, they create the conditions tumors need to grow faster.
 
Thin-Possible said:
Just a heads up that the BPC-157 and TB-500 found in both GLOW and KLOW could increase the risk of cancer.
Click to expand...

Thanks for mentioning this. It's a good reminder to consider all aspects. I've heard similar things, and it's definitely something to weigh against the potential benefits.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top