Sema not working as well as I hoped?

Hong Kong Yanpep International
How was transitioning from rybelsus to injections? The oral form at 7mg works really well for me but the pill is annoying to take.
 
thanks for this. losing some but nothing like the stories. still have food noise and cravings but eat less. thought i was unlucky till now. hanging in and working with my doc to figure out what works.
 
My posture tanked at one point, all hunched forward. Got a trainer to help and realized I needed stronger back muscles. Heavy lifting and some stretches for neck tension worked really well.
 
wake up not hungry and skip eating til 2pm easy. full lunch and almost don't need anything til next day except a small bite at 7. but start small in the morning and i can't stop, get HUNGRY.
 
35 lbs in 4 months the first time and then returning to find it worked differently is the tolerance reset story playing out. The break doesn't always reset the receptor sensitivity the way people expect. 14 months with a small break and 20 lbs is the version where the second run is genuinely less effective. Tirz is the next mechanism worth considering.
 
The food question alongside the weight and dose information is the right starting point before drawing conclusions about the medication not working. 14 months with only 20 lbs can mean a lot of different things depending on what the intake picture looks like. Running at a deficit while on sema sometimes produces less scale movement than expected because the medication changes water retention patterns early on.
 
The honest answer on calorie math is that sema doesn't override the intake picture - it just makes the deficit easier to create. 20 lbs in 14 months with a break is on the lower end. The honest audit of what's going into your body usually shows something.
 
This is exactly me. The hunger before GLP-1 was relentless and I don't want to go back to that. Even when I think about coming off, I remember what that constant noise was like. It wasn't just willpower - it was a physiological thing that was exhausting to fight every single day.
 
Genuinely enjoying reta but the hunger suppression side sometimes feels a bit lacking. My understanding is the other major option in this class tends to hit that harder.

For anyone who's made the switch, what pushed you to do it, and how did the two stack up in your experience?

Did the other option genuinely curb appetite more effectively for you?
 
Currently at a moderate amount and food noise is still present, able to push past the appetite suppression more often than not. Side effects stay minimal. A bit worn out for a day or so after each shot and occasional mild nausea.

Weight loss started right away and has stayed steady at one to two pounds weekly. Calories and nutrition get tracked closely. This medication doesn't kill the desire to eat entirely, but it dials things back enough to cut the compulsive urge and allow more thoughtful choices around food.
 
Mine is the reverse. At 1.5 my loss stopped; 2 mg plus a switch to belly injections has me losing nonstop. Spacing shots 10 days apart makes my sugar rise, I have diabetes. On 1 mg my A1C stayed elevated; 2 mg brought it to 5.4, great, but now I dont want to eat. Some days its only nuts and eggs so my stomach isnt empty. Dinner is my one meal, and Ive fasted intermittently for ages, which probably helps the loss. Consider changing what you eat, perhaps adding intermittent fasting, and rotating your injection site.
 
Eat under your maintenance calories. Heard it a billion times, I know, but semaglutide is only a tool: it curbs appetite, acts on the pancreas and insulin, slows digestion, and doesn't speed up metabolism. Mind your drinks! Juice and other calorie-heavy beverages sneak by. GO EASY ON YOURSELF! Quieter food noise gives us room to notice what we put in our mouths. Keep active and positive, tell your doctor your worries, and be honest about intake, nobody's judging you! Best wishes, keep going!
 
Semaglutide since early May for me, 25 lbs gone, at doses between .25 and .40. Have you cut back on food? Lower appetite should mean lower intake, hence a deficit. Choices still matter, though. Overriding hunger signals to eat Big Macs won't get results.
 
I think we're so used to tying weight loss to eating less that we miss what's happening metabolically. Sema mainly works the GLP1 pathway, driving satiety and appetite suppression hard. Reta hits GLP1 plus extra metabolic pathways, shifting how your body spends and processes energy, not just appetite. Two people eating 1000 calories, one on Ozempic and one on Reta, could see different results since their bodies handle that energy differently. That's the disconnect moving from Sema to Reta, intake looks fairly normal yet the pounds keep coming off. We assume minimal eating is the only path to real loss, but suppression and metabolic effects are separate things. There's also the mental side for anyone who's lived with constant food noise, easy to get attached to finally having that quiet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top