Bug_Buddy
Active member
Just giving everyone a heads up, SRY's most recent batch of T30 isn't looking good. They seem to be partially admitting fault while pointing fingers at Jano. There's probably more to the story, but I'm just sharing what's been made public.
I saw this elsewhere online and thought it was important to share.
----------
From Alan
Official Statement Regarding Recent Analysis Issues
To Our Valued Customers and Partners,
Recent testing by Janoshik Analytical on some products revealed concerning issues. We want to be transparent and accountable, so we're issuing this statement and taking action.
Unacceptable Delays: Reports took up to two weeks, much longer than usual.
Calculation Errors: After we noticed discrepancies, Janoshik corrected the data without explaining the errors.
Critical Issue: An odd peak at 274 nm (not typical for peptides) was incorrectly included in purity calculations, making results look worse than they were.
We spent over a hundred bucks for GC-MS to identify the unknown substance.
Our testing showed it was CAS 99-93-4.
Janoshik's revised report (two days later) called it p-Chlorocresol but didn't provide:
Molecular weight verification
Reason for the 274 nm peak attribution
Our Concerns:
p-Chlorocresol is a controlled substance that needs government approval to buy—we wouldn't use it intentionally. We've been in this business for a while.
Janoshik’s vague methods (changing reports without proof) isn't professional.
Limited Distribution: Only a small batch was sent out because our own testing caught the issue. No action is needed for customers who received it—we're taking care of it.
Ongoing Discussion with Janoshik: We want:
Complete data (MW, 274 nm peak justification)
Explanation for including the contaminant in purity calculations
Details on the testing delays
Zero Tolerance: We follow industry standards.
More Transparency: We're using third-party verification to prevent this from happening again.
We hope Janoshik will address these issues quickly.
SRYlab
June 15, 2026
I saw this elsewhere online and thought it was important to share.
----------
From Alan
Official Statement Regarding Recent Analysis Issues
To Our Valued Customers and Partners,
Recent testing by Janoshik Analytical on some products revealed concerning issues. We want to be transparent and accountable, so we're issuing this statement and taking action.
Unacceptable Delays: Reports took up to two weeks, much longer than usual.
Calculation Errors: After we noticed discrepancies, Janoshik corrected the data without explaining the errors.
Critical Issue: An odd peak at 274 nm (not typical for peptides) was incorrectly included in purity calculations, making results look worse than they were.
We spent over a hundred bucks for GC-MS to identify the unknown substance.
Our testing showed it was CAS 99-93-4.
Janoshik's revised report (two days later) called it p-Chlorocresol but didn't provide:
Molecular weight verification
Reason for the 274 nm peak attribution
Our Concerns:
p-Chlorocresol is a controlled substance that needs government approval to buy—we wouldn't use it intentionally. We've been in this business for a while.
Janoshik’s vague methods (changing reports without proof) isn't professional.
Limited Distribution: Only a small batch was sent out because our own testing caught the issue. No action is needed for customers who received it—we're taking care of it.
Ongoing Discussion with Janoshik: We want:
Complete data (MW, 274 nm peak justification)
Explanation for including the contaminant in purity calculations
Details on the testing delays
Zero Tolerance: We follow industry standards.
More Transparency: We're using third-party verification to prevent this from happening again.
We hope Janoshik will address these issues quickly.
SRYlab
June 15, 2026
